The Rise of 1960s Counterculture and Derailment of Psychedelic Research

Date:

August 9, 2024

Author:

Milan Kordestani

Entrepreneur, writer, and founder of 3 purpose-driven companies oriented toward giving individuals control over their own discourse and creation. Milan works to produce socially positive externalities through a mindset of social architecture.

Milan Kordestani

August 9, 2024

Originally published on
Rolling Stone

In the 1960s, the psychedelic music scene exploded, with bands like The Beatles, Jimi Hendrix and Jefferson Airplane, bringing psychedelics like LSD into the public discourse. Their music, infused with experimental sounds and mind-altering lyrics, was inspired by their well-documented use of psychedelics like acid and psilocybin mushrooms.

As the music scene embraced psychedelics, they also attracted negative attention from authorities. The entanglement of psychedelics with the volatile 1960s counterculture not only led to their ban but also stifled a potentially groundbreaking era of mental health research treatment, which would have shaped music and culture in profound and lasting ways.

This is psychedelics’ frustrating story of artistic and spiritual excess at the expense of scientific progress. But this is also an opportunity to learn from the mistakes of previous generations as we reopen the floodgates of psychedelic research and therapy today.

The Origins of Scientific Research on Psychedelics

Psychedelic research began in the early 20th century, with substances like psilocybin and LSD capturing the interest of scientists for their profound effects on consciousness. Albert Hofmann’s 1938 synthesis of LSD-25 led to the first documented acid trip when he inadvertently absorbed a small amount through his skin. This discovery prompted further investigation into LSD’s psychological effects, with Hofmann recognizing its potential for profound therapeutic applications.

In the 1950s, ethnomycologist Gordon Wasson brought psilocybin mushrooms to Western attention after participating in indigenous rituals in Mexico. His widely publicized accounts introduced these sacred fungi to a global audience, but the resulting tourism — including famous musicians like John Lennon and Bob Dylan — had devastating consequences for the Mazatec tribe, leading to exploitation and cultural erosion.

By the mid-1960s, researchers were investigating psychedelics for their ability to treat mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety and addiction. Influential figures like Dr. Timothy Leary and Dr. Stanislav Grof emerged, advocating for the transformative potential of these substances, with initial results suggesting deep psychological breakthroughs and lasting behavioral changes. Richard Alpert, originally a prominent Harvard psychologist, transitioned from academia to spiritual guru after profound experiences with psychedelics alongside Leary. He renamed himself Ram Dass, embraced Eastern spirituality and became a renowned teacher, author and countercultural icon, especially for psychonauts.

How Psychedelics Connected Scientists and Musicians, Fueling 1960s Counterculture

These pioneering scientists and researchers bridged the gap with musicians, who embraced psychedelics not for research but for recreation and artistic inspiration. Researchers like Leary weren’t just publishing papers — they were hosting counterculture gatherings, rubbing elbows with musicians like The Grateful Dead, and fueling the perception of psychedelics as a recreational free-for-all.

The Beatles, for instance, famously used LSD, which profoundly impacted their creativity and music, resulting in groundbreaking albums like Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Pioneering artists like Pink Floyd and Jimi Hendrix mirrored the mind-altering effects of LSD in their music, creating sounds that encapsulated the psychedelic experience and solidified the drug’s place in the counterculture movement.

Psychedelics played a significant role in the anti-war movement and civil rights activism of the 1960s, acting as catalysts for radical thinking and social change. Influential figures like Allen Ginsberg and Abbie Hoffman used these substances to challenge the status quo, advocating for peace and equality. Psychedelics fueled a sense of interconnectedness and empathy, which were pivotal in rallying people against the Vietnam War and supporting the fight for civil rights.

The Music Industry’s Role in the Scapegoating of Psychedelics

Despite the profound impact psychedelics had on the anti-war movement, civil rights activism and the counterculture ethos epitomized by festivals like Woodstock, their growing popularity also attracted significant scrutiny. As more people began using these substances to reject mainstream values and explore new realms of consciousness, the media increasingly portrayed psychedelics as dangerous and destabilizing.

Media outlets fanned the flames of fear with tales of bad trips and societal breakdown. Public anxieties rose, fueled by stories of LSD-laced Kool-Aid and free clinics handing out mind-altering substances. This, coupled with the counterculture’s embrace of psychedelics, led to a perception shift — from a tool for scientific exploration to a dangerous societal threat.

President Nixon, dogged by the increasing unpopularity of the Vietnam War, was all too happy to find a zeitgeist culprit. The psychedelic party came to a screeching halt in the early ’70s. The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 lumped LSD and psilocybin with heroin and cocaine, effectively shutting down legitimate research. With counterculture movements scapegoated and psychedelics seen as a societal menace, the scientific community’s promising exploration of these substances became an afterthought.

The resulting research shutdown prevented the advancement of our scientific understanding of psychedelics for several decades. A generation of scientists lost the chance to gather long-term data on the therapeutic impact of psychedelics. This knowledge gap — a direct consequence of prohibition brought on, in part, by the music industry — continues to hinder our understanding of how these substances can be harnessed to address today’s pressing mental health challenges.

The intertwining of psychedelics with 1960s counterculture and music had profound and unfortunate consequences. While psychedelic substances catalyzed significant social movements and artistic innovation, their irresponsible promotion by the music industry contributed to a climate of mistrust and misinformation.

Sensationalized media portrayals, hyper-enthusiastic musicians and high-profile incidents fueled public concern, overshadowing the therapeutic potential that early psychedelic research had begun to uncover. The abrupt halt in scientific exploration due to these fears represents a lost potential, leaving unanswered questions about the benefits that psychedelics might have offered to mental health treatment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite this, the cultural legacy of the 1960s endures. Psychedelic music and its ideals of peace, love and expanded consciousness continue to inspire new generations. Reflecting on this era, we learn valuable lessons about the delicate balance between innovation and responsibility, the dangers of sensationalism and the importance of preserving scientific inquiry from cultural and political turbulence.

In my next article of this series, we’ll see how psychedelic research has been revived and has found support from some unlikely corners, as both veteran groups and the next generation of musicians strive to normalize psychedelic-assisted therapy for managing mental health challenges.